Sub-Group

RFT - Agrochemical Residue Field Trials - 2012

Objectives

  1. In consultation with ACAC, to prepare and maintain a list of agrochemicals necessary to sustain successful leaf production and for which GRLs have to be set or reviewed.
  2. To produce a formal protocol for trial and testing procedures.
  3. To promote participation in this programme globally.
  4. To collate results of trials done under the formal protocol and make them available to ACAC.
  5. To collect already available field residue trial data from various sources and make them available to ACAC.

Purpose

As described in the CORESTA Guide No. 1, Guidance Residue Levels (GRLs) have been developed by the CORESTA Agro-Chemical Advisory Committee (ACAC) to provide guidance to tobacco growers and those in the tobacco industry interested in the application of Crop Protection Agents (CPAs), in compliance with the implementation of Good Agricultural Practice (GAP) in tobacco production. GRLs have been used worldwide as a reference when buying and selling tobacco. New CPAs are continually developed, and GRLs will need to be established in the interest of promoting responsible tobacco production. Residue data from field trials complying with label instructions are an integral component of establishing new GRLs. In order to create new and reliable GRLs, CORESTA decided to conduct additional residue trials and launched the dedicated Agrochemical Residue Field Trials Task Force in 2012. In January 2016, the Task Force was changed to a Sub-Group as its work and activities were viewed as being long-term.

Organisation

Coordinator:  Naoki Watanabe, Japan Tobacco Inc., Japan - naoki.watanabe@jt.com
Secretary:  Matthew Vann, North Carolina State University, USA - matthew_vann@ncsu.edu
Others:  Trial Executors and Sub-Group members (accordingly to availability)

Meetings

  • Vienna, Austria, June 30, 2012
  • Sapporo, Japan, September 22, 2012
  • Lexington, KY, USA, January 20, 2013
  • Brufa di Torgiano, Italy, October 12, 2013
  • Raleigh, NC, USA, January 11, 2014
  • Quebec, Canada, October 11, 2014
  • Izmir, Turkey, October 24, 2015
  • Berlin, Germany, October 8, 2016
  • Santa Cruz do Sul, Brazil, October 21, 2017
  • Kunming, China, October 21, 2018
  • Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, October 12, 2019

Achievements in light of the five original objectives (as of February 2014)

1.  GRL Candidates

ACAC provided a priority list of 23 CPAs for which GRLs should be defined. This list was classified as 1st generation candidates.

# Priority Active Ingredient Status Remark
1 I Azoxystrobin Completed  
2   Difenoconazole Completed  
3   Indoxacarb Completed GRL: 15 ppm
4   Propamocarb Completed  
5   Tebuconazole Completed  
6   Chlorantraniliprole Completed GRL: 10 ppm
7   Triflumuron Completed  
8   Triadimefon /
Triadimenol
Trials ongoing  
9   Ethion Trials ongoing  
10   Triazophos Trials ongoing  
11   Fenamidone Completed  
12   Flubendiamide Completed  
13 II Clothianidin Trials ongoing  
14   Dicofol Delisted  
15   Teflubenzuron Completed  
16   Iprovalicarb Trials ongoing  
17   Spirotetramat Trials ongoing  
18   Bitertanol Delisted  
19   Iprobenfos Delisted  
20   Thiacloprid Trials ongoing  
21 III Chlorfenapyr Delisted  
22   Prothiofos Delisted  
23   Quinalphos Delisted  

Field trials for 10 of the 1st generation candidates were finished by the end of 2018, and results were submitted to ACAC in order to discuss new GRLs. Six CPAs were removed from Priority II and III categories due to little use in 2018.

A further eight GRL candidates (classified as 2nd generation candidates) were introduced to the Sub-Group with a follow up request for executors to conduct field trials in 2018.

2nd generation candidate list

# Active Ingredient Status Remark
II-1 Propiconazole Delisted  
II-2 Trifloxystrobin Trials ongoing  
II-3 Chlorfluazuron Trials ongoing  
II-4 Fluopicolide Trials ongoing Some available results
II-5 Pyraclostrobin Trials ongoing  
II-6 Myclobutanil Not started yet  
II-7 Metolachlor Trials ongoing  
II-8 Mandipropamid Trials ongoing Some available results

A small number of field trials for Fluopicolide and Mandipropamid were already conducted by from 2014 to 2018, thus some information is presently available.

2.  Formal protocol

Essential points of study design

  • Duration: 3 years
  • Number of trials: 3 replicates per location
  • Planting conditions: Minimum 3 treated rows per treatment (leaf from central row sampled for analysis)
  • Application:
    • Only 1 agrochemical tested compound per treatment plot (row)
    • Adjust the conditions of application to obtain the expected highest residue per the product label, taking into account:
      • Rate; highest label rate
      • Number of applications; highest according to the label
      • Application intervals; shortest according to the label but target harvest based on the product's labeled PHI
      • Pre harvest interval (PHI); Label instruction
  • Sampling: 2 samples based upon stalk positions (one lower stalk sample and one upper stalk sample).

3.  Participants and tobacco type

  • 25 executors from 17 countries
    • North & Central America: USA, Mexico, Cuba and Guatemala
    • South America: Argentina and Brazil
    • Asia: India, Indonesia and Thailand
    • Africa: Malawi and Zimbabwe
    • Europe: Germany, Italy, Bulgaria, Greece, Macedonia and Turkey
  • Tobacco type: 4 types
    • FCV, BLY, ORT and Dark air-cured (DAC)

4.  Collation of results under formal protocol

  • From 2013 to 2015, more than 270 field trials from 25 executors in 17 countries have been conducted for 13 CPAs.
  • Additional trial results were accumulated from 2016 to 2018 (RFT-136-CTR). In total, 426 field trials have carried out as of October 2019. 
  • The results for 10 CPAs; Azoxystrobin, Difenoconazole, Indoxacarb, Propamocarb, Tebuconazole, Chlorantraniliprole, Triflumuron, Fenamidone, Flubendiamide, and Teflubenzuron were submitted to ACAC in order to discuss new GRLs.
  • Trials for 2nd generation candidates were launched in 2018 (RFT-207-CTR).

5.  Collection of already available residue trial data

  • Residue data from the field trials have been provided by CPA companies and organisations.
  • Data on CPAs outside of GRL candidates could be used for the verification of the current GRL values and/or for the selection of further new GRL candidates.

General

Poster Presentation at University of Kentucky Burley Tobacco Tour, 13 August 2019

 

Updated November 2019