Search Results

147 results

  1. CORESTA Congress, Online, 2020, Smoke Science/Product Technology Groups, ST 03

    Method development for the analysis of mono-carbonyl compounds in e-vapor products by LC-MS

    ZHU J.; HEREDIA A.; TWEEDY J.; TAYYARAH R.
    ITG Brands and Fontem USA, Greensboro, NC, U.S.A.
    At the 73rd Tobacco Science Research Conference (TSRC), we presented a novel method for quantitation by LC-MS of mono-carbonyl compounds in e-vapor product aerosol samples. The method is simple and robust with good recoveries. We have since extended...
  2. CORESTA Meeting, Smoke Science/Product Technology, 2019, Hamburg, ST 21

    A model based on cigarette density segmentation method for predicting burning cone drop rate of slim cigarettes

    TAN Chao; WANG Shitai; JIN Yong; CHEN Qian; TAN Haifeng; LI Ke; FAN Hongmei; LIU Qi; LI Rui; YU Saibo
    China Tobacco Hunan Industrial Co., Ltd. of CNTC, Hunan, P.R. China
    Burning cone drop is a potential safety problem and quality defect for slim cigarettes. In order to conveniently monitor the burning cone drop rate, a model based on cigarette density segmentation method was established and used for predicting the...
  3. CORESTA Meeting, Smoke Science/Product Technology, 2019, Hamburg, ST 45

    Meta-analysis of two biomarkers of exposure of tobacco products

    AYALA-FIERRO F.(1); ELAMIN A.(2); FROST-PINEDA K.(3); JIN T.(3); PRASAD G.L.(3); SARKAR M.(4); SCHMIDT E.(3); VERRON T.(5)
    (1) ITG Brands LLC, Greensboro, NC, U.S.A.; (2) PMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A., Neuchâtel, Switzerland; (3) RAI Services Company, Winston-Salem, NC, U.S.A.; (4) Altria Client Services LLC, Richmond, VA, U.S.A.; (5) SEITA - Imperial Brands, Paris, France
    In the context of tobacco products, broadly two types of biomarkers exist, biomarkers of exposure (BoE) and biomarkers of potential harm (BoPH). BoE measure exposure to tobacco constituents, e.g. carbon monoxide (CO) and nicotine equivalents (NEQs)....
  4. CORESTA Meeting, Smoke Science/Product Technology, 2019, Hamburg, ST Sustainability Forum

    Smoke-Techno Sustainability Forum

    RUSSELL C.(1); THOMPSON J.(2); RAVERDY-LAMBERT D.(3); MÜHLBACHER I.(4); COLARD S.(5)
    (1) Centre for Substance Use Research (CSUR), Glasgow, Scotland, U.K.; (2) Imperial Brands PLC, Bristol, U.K.; (3) SWM International, Le Mans, France; (4) Ökolab, Vienna, Austria; (5) CORESTA, Paris, France
    In 2015, the United Nations published 17 sustainable development goals and their corresponding targets to be achieved by 2030. Like other sectors, the tobacco and alternative product sectors are likely to impact most of the...
  5. CORESTA Meeting, Smoke Science/Product Technology, 2019, Hamburg, STPOST 02

    Electro-thermal simulation analysis of heaters in tobacco heating devices

    SUN Zhiwei(1); WANG Wei(1); DU Wen(1); WEN Jianhui(1); XIE Guoyong(1); WANG Zhiguo(1); DAI Hongliang(2)
    (1) China Tobacco Hunan Industrial Co., Ltd., Changsha, P.R. China; (2) College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, P.R. China
    Heat-not-burn tobacco products have gradually become an important development direction and a key research topic of tobacco products due to their remarkable advantages in reducing the release of harmful components. As a heat source for cigarette...
  6. CORESTA Meeting, Smoke Science/Product Technology, 2019, Hamburg, STPOST 33

    Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) indicates reduced risk potential for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects of the aerosol of the next generation products (NGPs) compared to reference cigarettes

    AYALA-FIERRO F.(1); CZEKALA L.(2); SIMMS L.(2); RUDD K.(2); CAVA G.(2); STEVENSON M.(2)
    (1) ITG Brands LLC, Greensboro, NC, U.S.A.; (2) Imperial Brands PLC, Bristol, U.K.
    In order to understand the potential relative health risks of NGPs compared to cigarettes, we compared the relative risks of aerosols from tobacco-containing and tobacco-free NGPs to the smoke generated from a reference cigarette. Quantitative Risk...
  7. CORESTA Meeting, Smoke Science/Product Technology, 2019, Hamburg, STPOST 49

    The CORESTA in vitro test battery for combustible tobacco products: update from the 2004 Rationale and Strategy Report

    LEE K.M.(1); JORDAN K.G.(2); WIECZOREK R.(3); MOENNIKES O.(4); CLEMENTS J.(5); CROOKS I.(6); HASHIZUME T.(7); MILLER J.(8); WEBER E.(9); YOSHINO K.(7)
    (1) Altria Client Services, Richmond, VA, U.S.A.; (2) RAI Services Company, Winston-Salem, NC, U.S.A.; (3) Imperial Brands, Reemtsma Cigarettenfabriken GmbH, Hamburg, Germany; (4) PMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A., Neuchâtel, Switzerland; (5) Covance Laboratories Ltd, Harrogate, U.K.; (6) British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd, R&D, Southampton, U.K.; (7) Japan Tobacco Inc., Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan; (8) JT International SA, Geneva, Switzerland; (9) Ökolab, Vienna, Austria
    In 2004, the CORESTA In Vitro Toxicity Task Force issued a rationale and strategy report, commonly known as “the CORESTA in vitro test battery guideline”. The goals of this guideline were to: 1) develop the rationale and strategy for conducting in...
  8. CORESTA Meeting, Smoke Science/Product Technology, 2019, Hamburg, STPOST 58

    A consortium approach for consumer-reported outcome measures to assess tobacco- and nicotine-containing products

    ACQUADRO C.(1) on behalf of the CORESTA CROM Task Force: AYALA-FIERRO F.(2); BLACK R.(3); CAHOURS X.(4); CHREA C.(5); CURTIN G.(6); GILES L.(7); McCAFFREY S.(3); PARK C.H.(8); PRASAD K.(9); SHERWOOD N.(10); SHIFFMAN S.(11); SMITH J.(6); SPIES E.(5)
    (1) Mapi Research Trust, Lyon, France; (2) ITG Brands, Greensboro, NC, U.S.A.; (3) Altria Client Services, Richmond, VA, U.S.A.; (4) SEITA - Imperial Brands, Paris, France; (5) Philip Morris Products S.A., Neûchatel, Switzerland; (6) RAIS, Winston-Salem, NC, U.S.A.; (7) JT Int'l SA, Genève, Switzerland; (8) KT&G Research Institute, Daejeon, Republic of Korea; (9) British American Tobacco, Southampton, U.K.; (10) Neil Sherwood Consulting, Commugny, Switzerland; (11) Pinney Associates, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.
    In the tobacco space, consumer-reported outcome measures (CROM) are essential for understanding motivations, subjective effects, and behavior. Such measures have become particularly important with the advent of candidate modified risk tobacco...